malasha72 malasha72
  • 21-01-2022
  • Business
contestada

Why should relevant costs be reflected in the objective function but not sunk costs?

Respuesta :

dakotalopez37
dakotalopez37 dakotalopez37
  • 21-01-2022

Answer:

Sunk costs (past costs) or committed costs are not relevant. Sunk, or past, costs are monies already spent or money that is already contracted to be spent. A decision on whether or not a new endeavour is started will have no effect on this cash flow, so sunk costs cannot be relevant.

Explanation:

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

A nectar-eating bird has a slightly more curved beak than average for its species. This allows the bird to more easily access nectar from plants. During the bir
how to make 0.24 into a whole number and a percent
Your Language SkillsNeither his father nor his mother (play, plays) the new game
Which statement correctly compares the transfer of genetic material during mitosis and meiosis? a. During both mitosis and meiosis daughter cells receive only h
is 1/8 and 8/8 are equal parts??
Define a variable and write an equation for each real-world problem. 1] Matt spent $ 6.50 on his lunch. This is $2.25 more than his friend Jackson spent on h
if 6 and 10 are factors of a number name four other factors of the number
Animals and plants have cells that are specialized by the process of _____.
Which totally revolutionized industry by increasing efficiency? the factory system mass production new materials water power
what is 352 rounded to nearest ten?